User blog comment:Windindi/Top 10 WORST things about Wikia/@comment-24796436-20141104225303

Most of these are the product of either human involvement, and/or technological programming faults.

So far, none of these have bothered me in a major way. We have just had vandal attacks here and there, but in most cases they were taken care of the same day.

About #9 You will witness this not only all over the internet, but within practically any peer environment where there is an established culture of some sort. See any sports team, club or group of any size greater than 5. (It's probably not that absolute but I'd bet the occurrence is over 90%; of course this depends on how you define the term "bully" but you get the point.)

About#8 Contrary to popular belief, I don't think it should actually be a goal to become admin at all. "Admin-ships" should be about serving the community's needs and not about climbing some imaginary hierarchy. With that position comes a responsibility, not so much a freedom. A bad admin is a strain on any given site. In some cases, admins need to be removed from power. (I digress)

The point is, there should be a need before anyone considers trying to become an admin (relevant to this conversation) on any wikia. In fact, there is a such thing as having too many admins and/or bureaucrats. What if they disagree? . . . .The most obvious case when you need to be fighting to become admin, is when none of the site's current admins are active. Here on this wiki, we actually don't need any more admins yet. Were it to become much more active, perhaps we could make a case for a new one.


 * 1) 3 and #1 also have to do with the human factor. Not all admins all good for their community. If they are and these numbers still apply, then the community isn't good by nature.


 * 1) 2 and #7 Tech issues. You will have tech issues as long as we have an imperfect world where humans are behind the programming. (Not saying that should change.)

I think that's enough of a response.