Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-3495717-20151022201317/@comment-24808209-20151026221800

(Read all of this before replying)

Likely going to get hate for this and lose a lot of respect from others, but...

I intentionally stayed quiet on this for a while, but thought I'd vote now. As Pingurules and Taurmega have said, it seems silly that vore is the only NSFW content being removed (or considered being removed right now), especially when we allow characters with hentai compatibility and NSFW characters such as Gurospooo and (Yes, I tried it) Stinger's deformed Hatsune Miku. As I said in the previous post about vore chars/edits, I don't like it as a fetish (or particularly in general), and I can understand why people like it and why people hate it. I can definitely see why we would need to put a 18+ on this site if we allow vore characters, but seeing as we do allow things such as the aforementioned NSFW abominations, shouldn't such a rating already be set in place? I know the article warns about the character being NSFW, but the same precaution is already on the articles of the vore stuff we currently have (The Lucario edits, Egggbomber's Lugia). To me, it does seem a bit biased, but (As Plasmoid said not that long ago), the NSFW chars/edits is for another thread. Oh yeah, and it also seems a bit unfair on one hand as there are characters that utilize fart/butt fetishes (*cough*Nicole Watterson*cough*Marge Simpson*cough*). Lastly, I have seen Zack's post on Deviantart about this being unfair towards people who create vore content, and that he thinks you (Or we) just don't want vore content on here and is why there is another poll on this subject (Which I highly doubt). I am not saying everyone who says 'no' to vore content is biased, because (as stated before) I can get why people like vore and why people hate it. I am also not saying that this IS biased, but rather I think some things seem biased. This is all I will say on this topic, so you kids have fun with your flame war. As for me...