Thread:PlasmoidThunder/@comment-24402875-20150506193548/@comment-24402875-20150508231357

Back to my stub arguement, I brought it up because it doesn't matter if they never come back to it. The fact is that it's a stub. That needs to be fixed. And if they won't, you can. You don't have to, it's not like deleting the page makes it any better. What does it do? Next to nothing in improving this wikia. And yes, you have deleted a page even though the page was just fine. I have only found one example which was the Nightwing page you had deleted because "Lack of MUGEN realted information" When it had movelists down and everything that is supposed to be there (With the exception of two moves I was missing, due to the fact that my Mugen Fight Factory was missing "QtGui4.dll" and therefore making it crash). You have certain pages where people can debate if a page should be deleted. This is rarely ever used. And it's unfair because there is no debates as to bring it back. We have to ask you ourselves. It's not a community discussion is you want a page to stay or not, it's just what the admins think of the page. That's not a community. And I'm not happy with an article that's pratically a Download link, because imo I also think that a page with just a download link is stupid. But if the page has information on it that's helpful (Such as a movelist) then it shouldn't be deleted. Mark it as a stub and move on. It's not such a big deal that people don't come back to it. You never even know what happens to people and why they can't return to an article. Maybe they're having computer issues, (Yes, computer problems can last for months depending on how severe it is, which is something that you cannot decide on your own) maybe they're going through a hard time, maybe they're the hospital, you never know. You can't know. Unless you're standing right there beside them. So here are my questions again.

Why make things like "Stubs" and "Articles For Deletion" if you're just gonna delete the page anyway? It's stupid.

Secondly, how do you know someone is as old as they say? And if you do, why ban them? Doom said "Because wikia totally won't be on our arses if we don't block knowingly underage users." Which translates to "Why not? It's not like the Wikia will get on us whether we do it or not." Also, just because they're young, doens't mean they're idiots and don't deserve to edit on a wikia and enjoy themselves.