User blog comment:PlasmoidThunder/Cheapie War No More/@comment-3064592-20151226071652/@comment-3064592-20151226204039

But we already know without needing to test beforehand that if a character that doesn't use external programs, then it is safe. Why should any characters that we know beforehand are safe without needing to test it be excluded? You still haven't explained that.

And Deoxys does, in fact, use such coding exploits, such as the OTHK and nulls.

And what do you mean by "the majority of a character"? Do you mean that if a character is a sandbag (no AI) for palettes 1-11 and a cheapie for palette 12, that they are not a "majority cheapie"? There are, in fact, some character out there like that.

Also, if you are using a "majority cheapie" guideline, then this rule makes no sense whatsoever since it could definitely allow in potentially dangerous characters if they use external programs and only do their exploits on palette 12. The thing that makes characters dangerous is the fact that they use external programs, NOT the fact that they are a cheapie or anything like that. Maybe you don't understand, and it doesn't seem like you do, but characters don't become dangerous because of how "powerful" they are, but because they use programs outside of MUGEN to do their thing. It feels as if you don't know much about computers.