Thread:PlasmoidThunder/@comment-24402875-20150506193548/@comment-24402875-20150508223832

First off, DoomBowser, are you saying you block people because you won't get in trouble for it? That sounds weird and odd. Also, you can't be too sure of someones age. How do you know? A chat? C'mon. Anyone can lie about that. You have no proof that they are underaged. None whatsoever. Text doesn't mean anything. And also, you have banned people you didn't like on the wikia. People have been banned simply because they told you not to bother them. People who say leave them alone wants to avoid conflict obviously, but instead you continue to bother them (By banning them, not actually talking it out on talk pages like you should). Which is another thing, you jump to ban waaaaayyyy too much and too fast. Before you ban someone, you should take it to the talk pages, not chat but the talk pages and talk it out and see what the problem is and how to fix it. That's what admins are supposed to do. Not just ban and think that will solve the problem. It's unfair and ruins the entire point of having a community in the first place. Pages also shouldn't be deleted once again for missing one moveset. Or one thing is missing from the article. Just let someone know like I said. Give the guy/girl who created the article a heads up like "Hey, you forgot to add this, can you do it as soon as possible?" Instead of just deleting the entire article that person put work into. Not all pages you delete have no MUGEN information. The way you delete pages also make no sense. Are you just gonna delete billions of pages that haven't been updated yet? And make people go look for the links and every all over again? Is that how the new article layout should be implemented? No. That's not how it should work. Like I said, either you can update it, or someone else can update it. Who cares what your wikia is attacked for. If you fix it in the future, it won't matter. It's not like everyone will be all like "MUGEN Wikia sucks because 6 years ago the pages had terrible grammar!" years after it's been fixed. It takes time. You can't delete articles and think that will make things better. If you're going to do that it ruins the entire purpose of having a "Stub" in the first place, since you delete almost every article that's a stub. If you aren't going to use it, then don't have it. Also, you purely deleted a page just because you think nobody has that stage. Even though the page was just fine. Would you delete something if I said that I don't think anyone has it? No. I doubt it.

So two things, Stop deleting articles so much and instead mark them as a stub and leave it at that. At least you'll look "somwhat good" to the point you would know what article is a stub and what isn't.

And two, just because you won't get in trouble for wrongfully banning people you THINK. Key word: THINK are underaged, then you're in the wrong for that. And again, if I said I was 12 years old right now, would you actually believe me? Or just go "Whatever"? Would you leginimately think I'm 12 just because I said it one day out of nowhere? If you do, then you should really think twice about it, because not everything people say is true. Not always. Exept what I'm saying now is true. Because I've been around. Sorta.