Thread:PlasmoidThunder/@comment-24402875-20150506193548/@comment-3495717-20150506212243

Hrm, what you posted doesn't sound like me at all. I have yet to ban someone who doesn't like me or I don't like. Only people I've ever banned are vandals and those who are underage (which is a rule stated by Wikia themselves, as Doom pointed out above). I have banned users who flat-out refused to listen to my helpful words (of which I often find myself repeating) and continued doing things wrong (one user specifically stated he refused to use the new layout).

Why do I keep Nintendo articles? I don't, actually, unless they're in an acceptable state. Why do the Pokémon articles look the best? Hrm, perhaps it's because I'm quite knowledgeable when it comes to Pokémon, and also down to the fact that I maintain a collection on Mugen Free For All, so I have some idea how most of them play. As I said to you before, I have deleted Pokémon articles that lack M.U.G.E.N-related information, so what you're saying about me favouring these articles is false.

I don't tolerate laziness; users should not create articles in a shoddy fashion and expect other users to complete the articles for them. For the record, your Nightwing article was given several hours to be amended before being deleted; we do have standards to maintain, so half-baked articles aren't going to stay around for very long unless someone gets them to a reasonable state (no brief description and gameplay text is not a reasonable state).

A lack of M.U.G.E.N information is one of the most valid reasons for deleting a page. I have more recently put the following as an additional reason: "Hardly any point in keeping an article on the MUGEN Database if there's no MUGEN information on the page."

I get that you're only here for the downloads, but our most common criticism stems from articles which lack M.U.G.E.N-related information, funny enough.

Admin buddies? No sir, the only user I promoted to admin status was Metalkong1, seeing as he was denied said status a few years ago for a rather flimsy reason and that I felt his contributions to the wiki (both edit-wise and assistance-wise) needed not to go unnoticed; he has served as one of the best admins, even if he doesn't edit much. As for the other admins, we don't actually have that many (not that are active, at least), and they were promoted prior to myself, so...

Reflecting on the above, people should not feel threatened to speak out, as I'm not the tyrant some users make me out to be. I will not ban someone for voicing their opinion... I look down on people that do that on other wikis. I appreciate your opinions on the state of this wiki, but we really do have to keep our standards tight, otherwise we'll start reverting back to what we were before, and that's not a state I'd like this wiki to return to.

If you have any further questions (or you just need to complain at me some more, lol), feel free to do so ;)