Thread:PlasmoidThunder/@comment-24402875-20150506193548/@comment-3495717-20150511210341

RainbowMassacre wrote: That's the rules for a stub article? DUDE. Then that Nightwing page was PERFECT. There is nothing wrong with the page if those are the requirements. If you think that is was less, then show me with pictures what the problems were then. Because your rules there are completely ridiculous and make no sense. The Nightwing page was fine. It was good. It should be restored immediately. If not then have a community discussion for it. And give out EXAMPLES of where the page went wrong instead of just listing rules dude. And underage thing, you never know. So you're abusing your power. "i think ur 9 lololololo ur underage lololo *bans*" That's how it is. You don't know them in real life and you can't prove you're right just by a simple message in the chat. Come back when you point and SHOW the flaws in the Nightwing page, not list the rules, there is a difference.

Listing Rules:

It has to look like my Nintendo pages. < This does nothing at all.

Showing the problems:

Well, you can see right here *Points* the page is missing a pallete gallery, so that's one thing misising. <-- That's how you tell the problems. What?

This is what the improve template looked like on the Nightwing page. I dunno where you're reading the rules for a stub, but I didn't post anything in my last message regarding that. If an article with the above slapped on it is "perfect", then clearly something's wrong.