Thread:PlasmoidThunder/@comment-24402875-20150506193548/@comment-7114405-20150512185502

Spidernite1 wrote: You're wrong. I had to movelists. Clearly you didn't pay attention to the edit. The edit hat it's specials and hypers there, the other version had basic moves which aren't required. As you have been told, the edits go on a separate branch article, what is the thing that you aren't understanding here?

I don't see you complaining about the Squirtle page even though that page only has two sentences for one of the versions, but you leave that alone. The Squirtle article is an old article waiting to be converted over, old articles only get deleted if they have practically no M.U.G.E.N related info on them, every other old article gets ignored until someone converts it over or maintenance tasks are performed on it (such as updating the artwork).

New articles, on the other hand, get deleted if they have barely anything on them, or if they use the old layout (after a day, so that it has a chance to be rectified).

Why didn't you add a category? It's relatively simple and would've been helpful seeing as my Mugen Fight Factory was having problems. What the hell does Fighter Factory have to do with you being too lazy to add a category? Are you expecting someone to do all of your work for you or something?

The gameply description was short because his character has barely anything. Here is an article on a character with 8 attacks, one of which can't be activated by human players, it just so happens to have 4 paragraphs worth of gameplay text; what is your counterargument to this?

I didn't see you complain when on the Nidoking page has no brief description and just a small gameplay description. That Nidoking character was made by an autistic 5-year old (his word, not ours), it's literally a Mystery Dungeon overworld sprite of Nidoking pasted on top of Kund Fu Man, making it perhaps one of the worst characters in the history of M.U.G.E.N (along with everything else that creator made).

And again that age thing, they could be joking you know. Or maybe they can be testing how foolish this Wikia is when it comes to age, who would actually believe what someone said on the Internet in a chat? IN A CHAT. It's your fault because you take it too seriously and want to ban people like crazy and use the age thing to justify it as if it works that way. It doesn't. 1. Who on the internet claims to be younger than 12 if they are over the age of 12?

2. Because we want another shitstorm where wikia bans a load of Database admins for the most paper-thin excuses (I'm referring to the Wlan personal info debacle).