User blog comment:PlasmoidThunder/This Is It - Proposed Layout Change Ahoy!/@comment-27106779-20141020163128/@comment-24796436-20141126045455

Yep. But here, spewgentook a glance at a screenshot and think that all we did was copy and paste sections into their own article.

If they would have even taken a cursory glance at this blog, or at least been a bit more thorough looking at the converted articles, they'd realize that at this point, the only major disagreement we have is the issue with the command normals. . . and I think that has been debated ad nauseam.

For those that haven't been paying attention, our side of the argument can be summed up as: for the sake of documentation integrity, we must have a 100% consistent way to define what a particular move is classified as. In order to do that, we align our definition with how the MUGEN engine identifies them.

FTR, I said the Mario article crashed my tablet browser. The article is huge, and that tablet is by no means state of the art.

For further reading, check me blog. <<< Intentional use of the word "me".