Thread:Clint242/@comment-3495717-20151126133040

Your original attempt at making an article in the new layout was rather erroneous to say the least, though users (myself included) did manage to patch it up as best they could without having to download the character, though it is still unfinished and needs improvement, hence the list at the top of the article.

Now, I never expect people to get things 100% on their first try, though your errors would imply you winged it without really looking at how these sorts of articles should be made (hint: look to the right of your screen; there's a section called 'layout change' located there). Most users then look upon what they did wrong the first time in order to make their second attempt better, but you made the exact same mistakes as your first attempt (even more when you consider that separate versions should have their own articles), which makes me think you've ignored what was wrong with the Pupa article (hence why you still haven't fixed it).

Creating an article in such an manner that's incomplete and ignores the article standard almost entirely is counter-productive as users then have to clean up the mess you made. Consider this a warning. 