MUGEN Database
Register

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

11 September 2023

22 April 2022

  • curprev 00:3500:35, 22 April 2022DoomBowser Message Wall contribsm 2,857 bytes 0 Protected "Toon Link": Locked until further notice to prevent an edit war ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
  • curprev 00:3400:34, 22 April 2022DoomBowser Message Wall contribs 2,857 bytes −51 Define "does not change the character". Samus' weapon upgrades do not change the character, Pokémon that learn moves outside of their typesdo not change them as characters, Fire Emblem characters being able to wield different weapons outside of their most iconic ones do not change them as characters, hence why we limited these categories to base form. Now to prevent this edit war from progressing further, I am locking this article until further notice, Tag: Undo
  • curprev 00:0700:07, 22 April 2022SigmaHero045 Message Wall contribs 2,908 bytes +51 Undo revision 399354 by DoomBowser (talk)Since when a simple equipment that doesn't change the character itself a powerup? That way the sword, shielf could still be here while being logically consistant. A logical compromise, right? Tag: Undo

21 April 2022

  • curprev 23:3923:39, 21 April 2022DoomBowser Message Wall contribs 2,857 bytes −51 The original logic was base form, no powerups, or basically what characters start the game with, but because you would then get silly situations like the Links not being sword/shield users despite the fact that every major artwork depicts them with both and that both are ultra-iconic to them. If I had my way, I'd toss all these categories off a cliff, but that's too destructive a solution just to get around some dumb technicalities Tag: Undo
  • curprev 20:3520:35, 21 April 2022SigmaHero045 Message Wall contribs 2,908 bytes +51 Undo revision 399351 by DoomBowser (talk) Actually by this logic, those aren't different forms of the characters, just basic tools they get in every single appearance of them. I can understand respecting certain core written principles, but NOT flipfloping around doing double-standards for identical situations to have your edits be done. YOU be consistant with your own logic, because I'm really starting to get confused on what it is. Tag: Undo
  • curprev 20:3020:30, 21 April 2022DoomBowser Message Wall contribs 2,857 bytes −51 By this logic, we should flood the Kirby and Mega Man articles with these types of categories again because someone, somewhere, will argue that many people consider those abilities iconic to those characters. This was the reason why we put limitations on these categories all those years ago to put an end to all this technicality nonsense Tag: Undo
  • curprev 20:2120:21, 21 April 2022SigmaHero045 Message Wall contribs 2,908 bytes +51 Using that same quite arbitrary subjective double-standard about Mario, I think it's fair to add them back, who DOESN'T associate Link with Bows, Boomerangs and Bombs? it's in every single game he appeared in, every single depiction I can think of has him using all of these, and, wouldn't you know it, in EVERY mugen character of him. How more "iconic to his visage" can you get than this? If you can use this argument, so can I. Tag: Source edit
  • curprev 20:0920:09, 21 April 2022DoomBowser Message Wall contribs 2,857 bytes −51 "Iconic to his visage" is literally the only reason Fire Element Users gets to stay on the Mario article, because Plas' argument is that fire is so iconic to Mario that most people would associate it with him by default, and you'd be hard pressed to find any art of Link without the Master Sword and Hylian Shield
  • curprev 19:5519:55, 21 April 2022SigmaHero045 Message Wall contribs 2,908 bytes +30 "not iconic to his visage", what is THAT supposed to mean? That's the first time I hear of that, where do you even got that from? Heck, why are "archer" "sword user" and "shield user" ok if TL never starts any game with any of these, aren't they power-ups too? Why are pokemon that can't selfdestruct lvl 1 included in "explosive users"? Arbitrary thing incoming... Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 19:3519:35, 21 April 2022DoomBowser Message Wall contribs 2,878 bytes −22 Not a base form power, nor is it iconic to his visage

16 July 2019

28 May 2019

16 December 2018

14 June 2018

13 June 2018

8 March 2018

11 March 2017

14 February 2017

16 January 2017

14 January 2017